Directive (EU) 2023/2673 – transposition into Luxembourg law
On 3 June 2026, the Luxembourg government tabled bill of law n°8758 (the "Bill") before the Chamber of Deputies, transposing Directive (EU) 2023/2673 of 22 November 2023 (the "Directive") on financial services contracts concluded at a distance. The Bill amends the Consumer Code and the amended law of 27 July 1997 on insurance contracts, and provides for its entry into force on 19 June 2026 - the date from which the Directive itself applies across the Union. Because parliamentary adoption is expected to follow that date, commentators have noted the provisions will apply with retroactive effect once enacted
Background for adoption of the Directive
Before the Directive, two separate EU regimes applied to distance-sold consumer contracts:
Directive 2011/83/EU governed distance contracts generally, such as online sales of goods and services, but expressly excluded financial services.
Directive 2002/65/EC filled that gap, laying down dedicated rules on pre-contractual information and withdrawal specifically for financial services sold at a distance, such as loans, insurance, investment and payment products.
The Directive has been adopted to repeal the 2002 text and to amend Directive 2011/83/EU by adding a new Chapter IIIa dedicated to distance-marketed financial services, substantially based on the 2002 text. Consequently, a single instrument now covers distance contracts generally, whether or not they concern a financial service.
The Directive proposes a set obligations for any business - bank, insurer, investment firm or otherwise - that supplies a banking, credit, insurance, pension, investment or payment service to a consumer at a distance (a 'Trader').
What changes in Luxembourg law
Among the changes proposed by the Bill, some of the key impacts on Luxembourg law will be driven by the following aspects:
Extended pre-contractual information obligation (new article L.222-14 of the Consumer Code and article 10 of the Insurance Contract Law). Traders will be required, among other items, to disclose of the consequences of late or missed payment, notify that a price or premium was personalised using automated decision-making, to disclose the environmental or social objectives targeted by a financial service, and to notify that a telephone call may be recorded.
New obligation for adequate explanations (new article L.222-17-2 of the Consumer Code and article 62-2-1 of the Insurance Contract Law). The Trader is required to explain, free of charge and before conclusion, whether the proposed contract and any ancillary services suit the consumer's needs and financial situation, and to provide a right to human intervention where the Trader relies on automated tools such as chatbots or robo-advice.
An online withdrawal function (new articles L.222-10-2 and L.222-19-1 of the Consumer Code and article 62-3-1 of the Insurance Contract Law). Online contracting interfaces will be required to embed a directly and continuously available, clearly labelled withdrawal mechanism, with a confirmation step and an acknowledgment of receipt. Unlike the other new rules, this function is not confined to financial products and applies to any distance contract concluded through an online interface.
A prohibition on manipulative online interfaces, or "dark patterns" (new article L.222-24 of the Consumer Code and article 62-12 of the Insurance Contract Law). Traders are barred from designing online interfaces that distort a consumer's ability to make free and informed decisions. The Directive sets a minimum standard, requiring Member States to prohibit at least one of the three practices listed in Article 16 of the Directive (i.e. biased prominence of certain choices, repeated re-prompting of an already-made choice, and making unsubscribing harder than subscribing). Luxembourg opted for the highest level of consumer protection: the Bill prohibits all three practices, aligning it with the equivalent prohibition under the Digital Services Act and with the French and German transpositions.
Luxembourg Consumer Union opinion
In an opinion published in August 2026, the Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs ("ULC") broadly endorsed the Bill as a faithful transposition, while raising two reservations. ULC noted that:
the regime carries no dedicated civil sanction: enforcement rests on the CSSF's existing administrative powers and on cessation or injunction actions under the Consumer Code, with no equivalent to the nullity or forfeiture-of-interest sanctions introduced in the parallel transposition of another piece of European legislation, the new Consumer Credit Directive (EU) 2023/2225. ULC flagged the inconsistency given how closely the two directives were negotiated and drafted together; and
drawing on the experience of France and Germany, where equivalent withdrawal functions have already been implemented, there is considerable variation in practice: certain Traders only surface the withdrawal button after an order is placed or delivered, certain Traders restrict access to withdrawal information to logged-in account holders, and terminology ranges from language tracking the Directive to generic "return" or "change your mind" labels. The ULC has called for implementation guidance to secure a consistent approach in Luxembourg.
Recommended action for in-scope entities
Because the Bill is expected to apply retroactively from 19 June 2026 despite its later passage, in-scope firms marketing to consumers at a distance should act promptly rather than await final adoption. Traders’ compliance and product teams should update pre-contractual disclosures, build or adapt an online withdrawal function, document a process for adequate explanations with human escalation for automated tools, and review online journeys and consent flows for manipulative interface practices.
Share on
